PUBLISHED IoT

Interpretive Structural Modeling in the Adoption of IoT Services

Kim, Y., Park, Y., Song, G.
KSII Transactions on Internet and Information Systems (2019) Vol. 13 (3) : 1184-1198
Impact Factor 1.5
Quartile Q3
Citations 7

Abstract

This study aims to use ISM to identify the enablers affecting the acceptance of IoT services. For this purpose, this study conducted an ISM analysis and a MICMAC analysis, extracted the enablers from Internet of Things-An Action Plan for Europe published by the EU for the research, and conducted interviews and surveys.

Research Overview

This study employs Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM) to analyze the hierarchical relationships among enablers affecting IoT service adoption, providing a systematic framework for understanding complex interdependencies.

Research Motivation

IoT Adoption Challenges

  • Complex ecosystem of technologies
  • Multiple stakeholder requirements
  • Interrelated adoption factors
  • Need for systematic analysis

ISM Approach Benefits

  • Reveals hierarchical relationships
  • Identifies driving and dependent factors
  • Provides actionable insights
  • Enables strategic planning

Methodology

ISM (Interpretive Structural Modeling)

  • Purpose: Identify hierarchical relationships among variables
  • Process: Expert judgment-based structural analysis
  • Output: Multi-level hierarchical model

MICMAC Analysis

  • Classification: Driver, linkage, dependent, autonomous
  • Driving Power: Influence on other variables
  • Dependence: Influenced by other variables

Data Collection

  • Source: EU IoT Action Plan enablers
  • Method: Expert interviews and surveys
  • Participants: IoT industry professionals
  • Validation: Iterative refinement

Key Enablers Identified

Technology Factors

  • Network infrastructure
  • Sensor technology
  • Data analytics capability
  • Platform interoperability

Business Factors

  • Business model innovation
  • Value proposition clarity
  • Ecosystem collaboration
  • Market readiness

Policy Factors

  • Regulatory framework
  • Standards development
  • Privacy protection
  • Security requirements

Social Factors

  • User acceptance
  • Digital literacy
  • Trust in technology
  • Behavioral change

ISM Results

Level 1 (Top): Dependent Variables

  • IoT service adoption
  • User satisfaction
  • Market growth

Level 2: Intermediate Variables

  • Service quality
  • User experience
  • Trust and security

Level 3: Driving Variables

  • Technology infrastructure
  • Business models
  • Policy support

Level 4 (Bottom): Fundamental Enablers

  • Standards
  • Regulations
  • Investment

MICMAC Classification

Driver Variables (High Driving, Low Dependence)

  • Policy and regulation
  • Technology standards
  • Investment support

Linkage Variables (High Driving, High Dependence)

  • Platform development
  • Security solutions
  • Data management

Dependent Variables (Low Driving, High Dependence)

  • User adoption
  • Service quality
  • Market outcomes

Autonomous Variables (Low Driving, Low Dependence)

  • Limited direct influence
  • Peripheral factors

Implications

For Policymakers

  • Focus on fundamental enablers
  • Develop comprehensive frameworks
  • Coordinate stakeholder actions
  • Address driver variables first

For Industry

  • Prioritize key enablers
  • Build ecosystem partnerships
  • Invest in infrastructure
  • Address user concerns

For Researchers

  • Structured analysis approach
  • Relationship mapping
  • Priority identification
  • Strategic planning support

Contributions

Methodological

  • ISM application to IoT adoption
  • Systematic enabler analysis
  • Hierarchical structure revelation

Practical

  • Priority setting guidance
  • Strategic roadmap development
  • Resource allocation optimization

Limitations

  • Expert judgment dependency
  • Static analysis snapshot
  • Context-specific findings
  • Binary relationship assumptions

Future Research

  • Dynamic ISM models
  • Cross-country comparisons
  • Longitudinal studies
  • Quantitative validation

Publication Details

Journal: KSII Transactions on Internet and Information Systems
Impact Factor: 1.5 (Q3)
Citations: 7
DOI: 10.3837/tiis.2019.03.007